A proposed USAID policy ignores the needs of women, especially lesbians, and aims to replace sex with “gender identity” in international humanitarian aid programs

Learn how women’s rights advocacy is becoming viewed as “misconduct” and public targeting of legal work protecting women and girls from “gender identity” policies.

We must recognize the female class, and we must recognize issues that impact the female class as disasters in their own right—not as prologues to real trouble for other, real people. Only by naming the issue and uniting as a cohesive class can we begin to work together towards a solution.

Dr. Mahri Irvine and Ms. Fiadh-Fernandez discuss and analyze radical feminism, why gender ideology is harmful to women and girls, and some of the reasons that people embrace the unscientific premise that humans can change sexes.

WoLF Board Member Liz Fedak Responds to the Independent Article "Being a radical feminist means being a trans ally at the same time:"

It's always frustrating to be in a conflict where only one party is listening.

Last week I was in Washington, DC to rally for women’s sports on the anniversary of Title IX. When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on the following day, I was presented with another opportunity to stand up for women’s rights: protesting at the Supreme Court just hours after this devastating ruling.

Earlier this month, Matt Walsh and The Daily Wire released a provocative documentary, “What Is a Woman?” The film is both a humorous and serious examination of a question we shouldn’t have to ask.

But ask it, we must.

WoLF unapologetically supports reproductive freedom for women. Reproductive freedom includes, but is not limited to, women’s rights to abortion and birth control for any reason, and freedom from coerced sterilization, abortion, and birth control.

As part of the progression of WoLF's lawsuit opposing SB 132 (Chandler vs. CDCR) - a law that places men into women’s prisons - WoLF obtained declarations containing sworn testimonies detailing how inmates are affected by its implementation.

When Justice Blackmun originally wrote the opinion on Roe v. Wade in 1973, it set a federal precedent that the right to abortion was included in a woman’s constitutionally protected right to privacy.