In partnership with many other agencies, we are demanding that the NCAA stop discriminating against women and establish rules to keep women’s sports female.

In this new blog series, Imprisoned: Women Behind Bars, we'll explore the multitude of challenges confronting incarcerated women in the United States — read more by the Women’s Liberation Front. 

On December 8, WoLF sent a petition demanding the Los Angeles Film Critics Association protect women’s award categories - it was signed by 712 concerned women and men around the world.

WoLF educated the NIH about research opportunities and needs related to “gender-affirming care,” including the physical and psychological impacts on female patients. 

Get the latest update about Hecox v. Little, the lawsuit concerning women’s single-sex sports.

Learn how women’s rights advocacy is becoming viewed as “misconduct” and public targeting of legal work protecting women and girls from “gender identity” policies.

WoLF submitted comments to the Virginia Dept. of Education focused on free speech, safeguarding of bona fide occupational qualifications, and the incorrect use of Bostock to support unlawful guidance, and described improvements to be made to the policies, including the use of coherently-defined terms and the protection of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) students.

On Nov. 4, 2022, the parties in the case of Peter Vlaming v. West Point School Board took their arguments to the Virginia Supreme Court to determine whether Virginia public schools have the power to fire teachers who refuse to use incorrect sex-based “preferred pronouns” as demanded by school students. In May 2022, WoLF filed an amicus brief for this case, bringing our radical feminist arguments to the Virginia Supreme Court. This article provides an update about Peter Vlaming v. West Point School Board.

Learn how your support brings hope to the feminist fight for sex-based rights in courts and legislatures—Plus, an exciting legal announcement!

Until December 31st, you can *triple* the impact of your giving to restore, protect, and advance sex-based rights!

Make a year-end gift to WoLF during the 2022 Holiday Match Challenge!

We call upon the Los Angeles Film Critics Association (LAFCA) to immediately reverse its decision and reinstate sex-based awards categories for acting. Furthermore, we call upon LAFCA leaders to share the full language of this petition and the list of signatories with the entire LAFCA membership.

Have you ever felt like all the different uses of the word "gender" don't match up? It's not just you — they don't. The word “gender” is defined in a wide variety of ways, depending on the different goals and agendas of the people using this word. This article explores some of the many different definitions of “gender,” illustrating that there is not an agreed-upon definition of this word. There are many different definitions used in activist communities, political groups, and in academia. The lack of an agreed-upon definition for “gender” makes miscommunication easy.

WoLF examines how a proposed change to Rule 8.4(g) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for lawyers will create a massive and novel intrusion into the beliefs and speech of lawyers regarding “gender identity” while they are in the courtroom -- and even when they are not actively involved in a case. This means that lawyers might be required by judges to use "preferred pronouns," or that "misgendering" will be viewed in the same light as racial slurs.

The Women's Liberation Front commends the correct application of “sex” while strongly opposing the involuntary conscription of female civilians on the basis of so-called equity. WoLF further urges the Biden administration to apply the same logic it used in its recent announcement about conscription – a logic that acknowledges biological reality – in all other facets of governance.

As an attendee of an elite institution that claims to be a women’s college, I was startled by what appears to be an obsession with “gender identity” and an abandonment of feminism permeating the culture and curriculum. I spoke with five of my gender critical female peers about the state of feminism at our college.

WoLF saw this invitation to submit a response as an opportunity to educate government administrators and leaders about several profoundly important issues related to women’s rights and the treatment of lesbians. WoLF is gravely concerned about how lesbians have been harmed by gender ideology.

The proposed HHS regulations will redefine discrimination on the basis of sex, expanding it so that “gender identity” will be considered a form of sex-based discrimination. If HHS is allowed to include “gender identity” as a form of sex-based discrimination, healthcare providers in a wide variety of government programs will be forced to provide “gender affirming” medical interventions to patients.

HHS has released proposed rulemaking titled Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities. These proposed regulations threaten women’s sex-based rights and they threaten healthcare providers who do not want to provide harmful, unnecessary cosmetic medical interventions under the guise of “gender-affirming care.”

WoLF submitted a co-authored amicus brief for A.M. v. Indianapolis Public Schools, a Title IX athletics case in the 7th Judicial Circuit Court.

WoLF interviewed Amie Ichikawa from Woman II Woman about Sagal Sadiq - a female prisoner who went on a month-long hunger strike - during our interview, Crisis in the World’s Largest Women’s Prison,

WoLF collaboratively released a statement with Family Policy Alliance (FPA), regarding our shared concerns about the US Department of Education’s proposed Title IX regulations.